Blog of Frankli

Apple Jumps the Shark With New iPod Shuffle

It seems Apple’s pursuit of simplicity in their devices never ceases, and it’s proven all the more true with their latest rendition of the iPod Shuffle which forsakes all the controls on the gadget entirely. The only “controls” on the small aluminum sliver is the On/Off switch that also dictates whether to play the songs on the iPod in order or randomly. The audio player is fully controlled through the headphones, which brings up the newest “feature” Apple has so graciously provided: the ability for the iPod Shuffle to talk back to you (yes, talk!) via VoiceOver which, at the push of a button, speaks the song title.

The absurdness of the device almost has me at a loss for words, I mean, it looks like Apple’s next iteration of the Shuffle line will resemble that of the iPod Flea. I’ve already dubbed Apple’s latest creation the iPod Leech, in the sense that it basically does nothing besides suck your money away. At $80 for 4GB of storage, there are plenty of other small mp3 players that have a physical LCD screen as well as controls to boot in the $50-$100 price range.

Apple gears their newest iPod Shuffle as a “tech-cessory” meaning “a device for those that don’t care and know nothing about technology but want to look cool and upbeat wearing this small piece of metal anyway.” The usability of this device to anyone that has previously owned any other iPod in the this physical plane of existence will be next to none for the sheer lack of any real interface. A major drawback deals with the cheap proprietary headphones that are required to operate the Shuffle. This is definitely not a device for audiophiles for the fact that you cannot use any high-quality headphones to listen to your random playlist. To be honest, I can only see teenagers using this device. Its random choosing of songs as well as the ability of holding up to 1000 songs at 128kbps quality is more than enough for a kid who doesn’t care about his hearing to pour into his head at full blast across the crappy Apple standard headphones.

The only redeeming quality I find in the new iPod Shuffle is its rediculously small size, which will make numerous hacks and mods inevitable. Just like the Gen1 iPod Shuffle Juicy Fruit hack, I can only imagine where hackers will find to put this thing, such as in a BIC lighter, a breathmint case, or perhaps even combine it with a bluetooth headset in some way. I also have to give Apple kudos for making the first iPod that someone can feasibly swallow. I can only imagine the news story of a dancing teenager tripping in his house while listening to this thing clipped to his shirt and it accidentally falling in his mouth and down his throat. I will secretly pray that it happens just so I can see a picture of the x-ray.

The bottom line: It looks like Apple has finally jumped the shark with the iPod Shuffle line, which, it seems, is slowly becoming a trend across all spectrums of the Apple iPod genre. First it was the iPod Nano when Apple released the “Nano Fatty” as coined by the interwebs, which a little later became the iPod Nano it is today, which is exactly the same device that has the original screen turned on its side, a more curved look, and the Shake-to-Shuffle feature. Not to mention there hasn’t been an update to the original iPod line in quite a while. Leo Laporte relates this trend in a good way by saying that Apple is becoming like a car manufacturer by creating newer models that are exactly the same as their older models, but the newer models have “fins” such that to differentiate themselves from the older models. It looks like this is all Apple does now with most of their iPod line – adding fins as features.

March 11, 2009 Posted by frankli | Uncategorized | , , | No Comments Yet

Disappointment in Diggnation – A Digger’s Delima Dealing with Discriminative Age Decree

Being a self-proclaimed geek and computer nerd, I’ve known of Diggnation for quite a long time, and after watching their announcement on episode 190 and learning that they were going to do a live Diggnation in Austin, Texas for SXSW on March 14, my geek-out meter just about broke the scale (I live just hours away from Austin). This date happens to fall on the same week as my Spring Break, and what better to do for Spring Break than to party Diggnation style? It became almost too good to be true when they further announced that it will be open to all ages, meaning my girlfriend (age 19) and some friends in the Austin area, equal Diggnation fans as well, would be able to attend. As it turns out, however, it was too good to be true. From Digg’s most recent Digg Town Hall webcast episode from February 26 with Kevin Rose and Jay Adelson, it was further clarified that the live show age limit was 21 and over. This depressing bit of news spurred me to write the following email to the Diggnation and Revision3 team:

————————————————————————————————————————–

Hello Kevin, Alex, and the rest of the Diggnation/Revision3 team,

Words cannot express how incredibly disappointed I am with this age limit of 21+ for the live show in Austin for SXSW, especially after being put under the original pretense that it was for all ages. Even though I am 21, my girlfriend (and fellow fan of Diggnation) is only 19 and we were making big plans on driving to Austin since this will probably be the last time Alex and Kevin come to Texas for a while (she lives in Houston while I live in Dallas). I say “were” because it looks like those plans will not come to fruition now. For the past years that I’ve watched Diggnation (since episode 1) and seen announcements about the live shows, I always got miffed about the 21+ age limit imposed at some venues even though it was impossible for me to go because of the vast distance anyway. Now it seems impossible yet again for I will not be able to enjoy a live show that I can actually attend because my significant-other as well as other friends in Austin wanting to attend are considered “under age” yet over 18 and considered adults.

Obviously the reason for the imposed age limit of 21+ is for alcohol control (there will probably be a bar and also drinking involved…hey, it’s Diggnation after all), but why not implement some sort of system where if a person attending is under 21, then they get large black X’s marked on the back of their hands in permanent marker so that the bartenders know not to sell alcoholic beverages to them? I’m sure it’s not that hard to give bartenders and waiters instructions for one night not to sell any alcohol to anyone with black X’s on their hands, nor will it be hard for the bartenders and waiters to comprehend these instructions. I’ve seen this procedure implemented at numerous clubs and social events in bars and it seems to work fairly well. If the question comes down to man-power to do this, then I’m quite positive people will likely volunteer for this type of crowd-control duty. I’ll be happy to do it myself, and I will be more than happy to send the Diggnation/Revision3 team my contact information to help organize an ID-checking and marking team so that people enter into the venue in an organized and safe manner.

This is the point I’m trying to make here: there are plenty of fans that are old enough to vote or have a license to carry a gun, but at the same time cannot attend the live show of one of their favorite internet-television programs because they are still considered “under age.” I hope this Diggnation live-show trend somehow gets changed for future shows, even if I’m still unable to attend, because I don’t agree seeing such a loyal fanbase treated so unfairly because of their youth.

Not looking forward to not attending,

*personal info excluded*

————————————————————————————————————————–

In short, my aim is for future live shows to be open to more age groups and not just the “drinking crowd.” It may be too late to change the plans for their March 14 Diggnation, but I want those who were like me – seeing the announcements and wanting to go to a live Diggnation, but can’t because of the distance – and get their chance when a live show finally comes to a city near them, not to be robbed by some miniscule and asinine technicality such as age.  I hope that this age limit of 21 and over does not become the standard for Diggnation’s live shows, and I believe quite a few fellow Diggers feel the same way.

UPDATE:

It seems the age limit for the live Diggnation has been changed back to the original “all ages” age group. The most official proof I could find of this was from Revision3’s blog post about the event.

March 2, 2009 Posted by frankli | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Beware of the Warlock!

This Halloween I decided to get more involved than I usually do construct a costume from my favorite MMORPG World of Warcraft. Specifically a warlock in the tier 5 armor set Corruptor Rainment. I went on a 72-hour construction spree with very little sleep in between (approximately only 6 hours), and I have to say I’m very pleased with the final results. Sure I need to do some more slight modifications and improvements, but given the time restraint it went really well. Here are some pictures of the final result. I’m thinking of making a tutorial on how to make some Mantle of the Corruptor shoulders so others can make some themselves. Give me your thoughts by sending an email to me at franklid (at) gmail (dot) com or just commenting on this post. If there’s enough interest I’ll get right on the tutorial and maybe even submit it to instructables.com! Enjoy.

These are the shoulders that I made. They mostly consist of cardboard, duct-tape, and a ton of hot glue. This is what took most of the 72-hours to create, seeing as how they are the most detail-intensive part of the costume. The strips of cloth in between the two shoulder pieces are used to tie around my neck when I put them on, because they are so large that they start to slide down my arms if I don’t have them anchored to something (in this case: my neck).

I wired in red LEDs into the eye sockets of each of the 3 skulls to give them a nice, menacing glow. These were then hooked up to a small battery and switch so I could easily turn them on or off on each shoulder. I’ll go more in depth in the tutorial (if one is made).

These were simple LED eyes that I got from a “Phantom spirit” costume at my local halloween store. The costume came complete with robe, veiled hood, and these electric eyes with faded in and out. The eyes were originally round, so I just wrapped electrical tape around them to form triangles for a meaner, narrowed-eyes look.

Here is the costume in its entirety:

^^Casting Immolate^^

^^Casting Shadow Bolt^^

What it would look like in the dark (sort of).

If there are any questions or you want more photos (or request that I do a tutorial on how I made the shoulders) send me an email at Franklid (at) gmail (dot) com.

November 6, 2008 Posted by frankli | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Live From Quakecon!

Blogging live from the Quakecon id software/ John Carmack keynote and a lot has been announced, including Wolfenstein RPG for mobile phones, new online Wolfenstein multiplayer, QuakeLive beta, and a new Rage trailer. If you want a play-by-play, follow my Twitter feed at:
http://www.twitter.com/frankli

More to come later!

July 31, 2008 Posted by frankli | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet